Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 24
Filter
1.
Rev. ADM ; 79(5): 257-263, sept.-oct. 2022. ilus, tab
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-1426815

ABSTRACT

Introducción: existen diversos patógenos que pueden afectar no sólo la salud periodontal, sino también la salud general de los pacientes. Objetivo: determinar la Porphyromonas gingivalis (PG) en el primer molar superior derecho de adolescentes, de entre 12 y 18 años, con al menos un mes de tratamiento de ortodoncia con aparatología fija. Material y métodos: se realizó un estudio observacional, descriptivo, transversal de casos en un grupo de 26 adolescentes con tratamiento de ortodoncia, compuesto de brackets metálicos, tubos o bandas, arcos NiTi termoactivos, módulos, cadenas o ligaduras; sin importar sexo, edad, tiempo de tratamiento o maloclusión. Se formaron dos pares de grupos 1 y 2 (15 mujeres y 11 hombres), A y B (13 mujeres y 13 hom- bres) comparando los resultados obtenidos entre los grupos. Resulta- dos: dentro del grupo 1 y 2 la detección molecular de microorganismos arroja que 80% fueron positivas a la PG, 58.33% presenta maloclusión y en promedio 89% de las pacientes son positivas a PG. La detección molecular del grupo A y B indica que 54.54% fueron positivos a PG, mientras que 83.3% presenta maloclusión y en promedio 47% son positivos a PG. Conclusión: la explicación de los eventos moleculares que se desencadenan en la cavidad oral y los sistemas afectados por PG contribuyen a la prevención de complicaciones al tener una mejor comprensión de los fenómenos infecciosos (AU)


Introduction: there are various pathogens that can affect not only periodontal health, but also the general health of patients. Objective: to determine Porphyromonas gingivalis (PG) in the upper right first molar of adolescents, between 12 and 18 years old, with at least one month of orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances. Material and methods: a cross-sectional descriptive observational study of cases was carried out in a group of 26 adolescents with orthodontic treatment, consisting of metal brackets, tubes or bands, thermoactive NiTi archwires, modules, chains or ligatures; regardless of sex, age, treatment time or malocclusion. Two pairs of groups 1 and 2 (15 women and 11 men), A and B (13 women and 13 men) were formed, comparing the results obtained between the groups. Results: within group 1 and 2, the molecular detection of microorganisms shows that 80% were positive for PG, 58.33% presented malocclusion and an average of 89% of patients were positive for PG. The molecular detection of group A and B indicates that 54.54% were positive for PG while 83.3% presented malocclusion and on average 47% were positive for PG. Conclusion: the explanation of the molecular events that are triggered in the oral cavity and the systems affected by PG contribute to the prevention of complications by having a better understanding of the infectious phenomena (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Child , Adolescent , Orthodontic Brackets/adverse effects , Porphyromonas gingivalis/isolation & purification , Dental Plaque/microbiology , Orthodontic Appliances, Fixed/adverse effects , Epidemiology, Descriptive , Cross-Sectional Studies , Gingival Crevicular Fluid/microbiology , Observational Study , Mexico , Molecular Biology/methods
2.
J. appl. oral sci ; 29: e20200879, 2021. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-1286922

ABSTRACT

Abstract Objective: Pain is a problem during bracket removal, and more comfortable treatment is needed. This study examined the association of pain with the removal force required for ceramic brackets, compared with metal and plastic brackets, to determine which removal method resulted in less pain and discomfort. Methodology: 81 subjects (mean age, 25.1 years; 25 males and 56 females) were enrolled, from whom 1,235 brackets (407 ceramic, 432 plastic, and 396 metal) were removed. Measured teeth were distinguished at six segments. Pain was measured with a visual analogue scale (VAS) during the removal of each bracket. An additional grip was placed on the grips of debonding pliers with right-angled beaks; a mini loading cell sensor pinched by the grips was used to measure removal force during debonding. VAS and force values were statistically analyzed. The Kruskal-Wallis test followed by the Mann-Whitney U test with Bonferroni correction were performed for multiple comparisons; multiple regression analysis was also performed. Results: Forces in the upper and lower anterior segments were significantly smaller (p<0.05) than those in the other segments. Pain tended to be greater in the upper and lower anterior segments than in the posterior segments. In all segments, the removal force was greater for metal brackets than for plastic or ceramic brackets. Ceramic brackets caused significantly greater pain than plastic brackets for the upper and lower anterior segments. Debonding force was involved in the brackets, following adjustments for pain, upper left segment, age, and sex. Conclusions Pain and discomfort are likely to occur during bracket debonding.


Subject(s)
Humans , Animals , Adult , Orthodontic Brackets/adverse effects , Dental Debonding/adverse effects , Pain , Ceramics
3.
J. appl. oral sci ; 27: e20180003, 2019. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS, BBO | ID: biblio-975881

ABSTRACT

Abstract Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate patients' pain levels during four different debonding procedures. The null hypothesis was that the pain perception of the patients undergoing four different debonding applications was not statistically significant different. Material and Methods One hundred and twenty orthodontic patients who underwent orthodontic debonding were included in this study. The patients were randomly divided into 4 groups according to technique used in the patients. Debonding groups were as follows: Group 1) Conventional debonding group, Group 2) Medication group (acetaminophen was given 1 hour before debonding), Group 3) Soft bite wax group, and Group 4) Soft acrylic bite wafer group. The patients' levels of anxiety and fear of pain were evaluated before debonding, and Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) was applied to evaluate their pain perception during debonding. Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to evaluate non-normally distributed data. Categorical data analysis were carried by chi-square and McNemar tests. The significance level was set at p<0.05. Results Anxiety scores of the patients were not statistically significant between both genders and debonding groups. In the quadrants in which the patients were perceived, the highest pain level was in the left side of the mandible. The teeth in which the highest pain level was perceived were the lower left and upper right lateral incisors. Although there was no statistically significant difference among the pain scores of the patients in each group, quadrant scores of female patients showed significant differences, being the lowest scores in the soft bite wax group. Conclusions Majority of the patients had no fear of pain before debonding. Pain levels of the patients in the conventional debonding group were not significantly different from those of the other groups, except quadrant scores of females in the soft bite wax group. The null hypothesis was accepted.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Child , Adolescent , Toothache/etiology , Orthodontic Brackets/adverse effects , Dental Debonding/adverse effects , Pain Perception , Reference Values , Toothache/psychology , Bite Force , Pain Measurement/methods , Prospective Studies , Age Factors , Dental Debonding/methods , Dental Debonding/psychology , Dental Anxiety/physiopathology , Statistics, Nonparametric
5.
Univ. odontol ; 36(77)2017. ilus, tab
Article in Spanish | LILACS, COLNAL | ID: biblio-996489

ABSTRACT

Antecedentes: A través del tiempo se han propuesto diferentes técnicas para realizar la remoción del adhesivo y resina remanentes luego de retirar los brackets, pero no existe un consenso entre los diferentes autores. Objetivo: el propósito de esta revisión sistemática fue identificar cuál es la técnica más adecuada para evitar injuria al esmalte durante la remoción de la resina remanente después de retirados los brackets. Métodos: Esta revisión sistemática se basó en los lincamientos de PRISMA, Para recolectar la evidencia publicada se realizó una búsqueda electrónica en diferentes bases de datos. Resultados: Se encontraron 8 artículos con una evidencia media (> de 9) los cuales fueron considerados en esta revisión sistemática. Al parecer la remoción de resina y adhesivo remanentes con ultrasonido, fresa de carburo de tungsteno de alta velocidad y piedras blancas generan la mayor pérdida de esmalte, mientras que 6 artículos proponen la fresa de tungsteno de baja velocidad como la mejor técnica. Conclusiones: Se requieren estudios aleatorizados, con grupo control, doble-ciego y una técnica de análisis del esmalte estandarizada para poder generar un nivel de evidencia alto y dar recomendaciones más acertadas para el clínico.


Background: Over time different techniques have been proposed for the removal of the remaining adhesive and resin after the removal of brackets, but there is no consensus among authors. Objective: Evaluate the most appropriate technique to prevent injury to the enamel during the removal of the remaining resin after the brackets are removed. Methods: This systematic review is based on the guidelines of PRISMA, to collect the published evidence there was a various electronic databases search. Results: There were only 8 items with medium evidence (> 9) which were considered in this systematic review. Apparently removing remaining adhesive resin with ultrasound, tungsten carbide cutter high speed and white stones generate the greatest loss of enamel, while 6 articles propose the tungsten bur at low speed as the best technique. Conclusions: Randomized studies with control group, double-blind and a standardized technique of enamel analysis are required to generate a high level of evidence and give more accurate recommendations for clinicians.


Subject(s)
Orthodontics , Resins, Synthetic/analysis , Orthodontic Brackets/adverse effects
7.
Rev. Fundac. Juan Jose Carraro ; 22(42): 36-40, 2017. ilus, graf
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-908169

ABSTRACT

Objetivo: evaluar el nivel de contaminación por Candida spp, post uso del instrumental de ortodoncia que se utiliza intrabucalmente en pacientesColombianos y Argentinos. Materiales y métodos: Se incluyeron pacientesentre 16 y 65 años, de ambos sexos, con armado de brackets superior e inferior. Criterios de Exclusión: pacientes con brackets de autoligado, con enfermedades autoinmunes, con enfermedades sistémicas con manifestaciones en el periodonto, pacientes fumadores, menores de 16 años y con armado de brackets en un solo maxilar. Se analizaron los alicates de corte distal Hu Friedy luego de ser utilizados para seccionar el arco por distal del último tubo presente enboca. Se estudiaron 80 pacientes agrupados en: Grupo A 40 pacientesColombianos, Grupo B 40 pacientes argentinos. Se realizó una primer tomaintrabucal con un hisopo estéril y se llevó a un tubo con medio de Stuart. Se cortaron las 4 secciones distales de los arcos en boca tardando al menos 1 minuto. Con un segundo hisopo estéril se frota toda la superficie del alicate post uso y se llevaron a otro tubo. Se sembraron en Chromagar Candida y se realizaron pruebas microbiológicas convencionales. Resultados: Las pinzas estériles aparecen contaminadas post corte distal delos alambres en el 95% de los casos en ambos países. Hubo diferencia entrelos pacientes colombianos y los argentinos respecto a las especies, ya que enlos primeros la especie con mayor prevalencia fue Candida tropicalis tanto en lapinza como en la cavidad bucal, mientras que en los argentinos fue Candidaalbicans. Conclusión: las pinzas de ortodoncias se contaminan con Candidaspp post utilización en boca y son un fómite a partir del cual puede generarsediseminación sistémica así como infección cruzada.


Subject(s)
Male , Female , Humans , Adolescent , Adult , Young Adult , Middle Aged , Candida albicans/isolation & purification , Candida tropicalis/isolation & purification , Dental Instruments/adverse effects , Dental Instruments/microbiology , Orthodontic Brackets/adverse effects , Orthodontic Brackets/microbiology , Argentina , Colombia , Culture Media , Equipment Contamination/statistics & numerical data , Fomites , Data Interpretation, Statistical
8.
Acta odontol. latinoam ; 29(1): 42-48, 2016. ilus, tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-790206

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to assess periodontal status and bloodparameters in orthodontic patients with nickel allergy one monthafter removal of brackets. Ninety-six randomly selected patientswere initially evaluated. Allergy to nickel was diagnosed using apatch test. After determining the prevalence of subjects allergic tonickel, two groups were formed: 16 allergic (experimental) and 16non-allergic (control) patients. Their periodontal status wasdetermined regularly by a single, blinded, duly calibrated examinerusing the Lõe Index (GI) and their blood was tested (complete bloodtest, including nickel and IgE levels) after nine months oforthodontic treatment and again one month after removing theorthodontic appliances. Statistical analyses included paired andnon-paired t-tests, Mann-Whitney, Wilcoxon, McNemar and lineartrend chi-square tests (p≤0.05). Comparison of the values recordedduring orthodontic treatment and one month after removing theappliances showed that in the allergic group there was significantincrease in eosinophils (p=0.046), basophils (p=0.001) andmonocytes (p=0.002), and decrease in number of bands (p=0.000),while in the control group, there was increase in lymphocytes(p=0.039) and decrease in segmented neutrophils (p=0.030) andIgE levels (p=0.001). In both groups, plasma nickel levels increased(p=0.010; p=0.039) and GI scores decreased. One month afterremoving the brackets, blood and periodontal parameters frompatients with and without nickel allergy were similar.


O objetivo do presente estudo foi avaliar a condição periodontal eos parâmetros sanguíneos em pacientes alérgicos ao níquel, ummês após remoção dos aparelhos. Noventa e seis pacientesselecionados aleatoriamente foram inicialmente avaliadas. Alergiaao níquel foi diagnosticada usando um teste de contato. Após adeterminação da prevalência de alergia ao níquel, formaram-sedois grupos: 16 pacientes alérgicos (experimental) e 16 nãoalérgicos (controle). Condição periodontal foi diagnosticadaatravés do Índice de Lõe (IG). Parâmetros sanguíneos foramdeterminados por meio de um exame de sangue completo,incluindo a quantificação de níquel e níveis de IgE. Avaliações doestado periodontal foram realizados por um único examinador deforma cega, devidamente calibrado e amostras de sangue foramtomadas depois de nove meses de tratamento e um mês após aremoção dos aparelhos ortodônticos. Análise estatística utilizadafoi testes t pareado e não pareado, Mann-Whitney, Wilcoxon,McNemar e qui-quadrado de tendência linear (p≤0,05). Emcomparação com os valores observados durante o tratamento, onúmero de eosinófilos (p=0,046), basófilos (p=0,001) e monócitos(p=0,002) aumentou significativamente depois da remoção dosaparelhos ortodônticos, ao passo que o número de bastões(p=0,000) diminuiu entre os períodos no grupo alérgico. O númerode linfócitos (p=0,039) aumentou no grupo controle e o número desegmentados (p=0,030) diminuiu. A diminuição dos níveis de IgE(p=0,001) entre os períodos ocorreu no grupo de controle. Níveisde níquel no plasma aumentou após a remoção de aparelhosortodônticos em ambos os grupos (p=0,010; p=0,039). O IGdiminuiu em ambos os grupos. Parâmetros periodontais esanguíneos de pacientes com alergia ao níquel foram semelhantesaos não alérgicos um mês após a remoção dos aparelhos.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Adolescent , Adult , Female , Child , Young Adult , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/etiology , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/blood , Nickel/adverse effects , Orthodontic Brackets/adverse effects , Chi-Square Distribution , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/epidemiology , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/immunology , Periodontal Index , Data Interpretation, Statistical
9.
Dental press j. orthod. (Impr.) ; 20(5): 66-71, tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-764536

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Fixed orthodontic appliances patients suffer limitations on the effective control of biofilm by mechanical methods, bringing the need of a coadjutant in the control of inflammation and oral health improvement.Objective: The aim of this prospective split-mouth blind study was to analyze the effect of a 40% chlorhexidine (CHX) varnish on gingival growth of patients with orthodontic fixed appliances. Methods: Healthy teenage patients with fixed orthodontic appliances and increased gingival volume were recruited (n = 30). Each individual was his own control, having in the maxilla one control side and one treatment side. An application of varnishes occurred on the vestibular area of the upper premolars and first molar crowns, on the control side (placebo varnish) and on the experimental side (EC40(r) Biodentic CHX varnish). The varnishes and sides were randomly chosen and its identification and group was kept by a third party observer and it was not revealed to the researchers and participants until the end of study. In order to establish a baseline registration, digital photographs were taken by a trained photographer before varnish application at baseline (T0), as well as 14 days (T14) and 56 days (T56) after the application. The gingival volume was calculated indirectly using the vestibular areas (mm2) of the upper second premolars' clinical crowns by RapidSketch(r) software, at all study times. The data were analyzed using ANOVA and the Turkey-Krammer test.Results:It was observed, in the final sample of 30 individuals, that at T0, the control and treatment groups were similar. At T14 and T56, a progressive reduction of the clinical crown area was seen in the control group, and an increase in the average area was detected in the experimental group (p < 0,05).Conclusions: The use of 40% CHX varnish decreases the gingival overgrowth in patients undergoing orthodontic treatment. Further studies are necessary to set the action time and frequency of application.


Introdução: pacientes com aparelhos ortodônticos fixos sofrem limitações no controle efetivo de biofilme por métodos mecânicos, trazendo a necessidade de um coadjuvante no controle na inflamação e melhora na saúde bucal.Objetivo:esse estudo cruzado prospectivo randomizado teve como objetivo analisar o efeito do verniz de clorexidina (CHX) a 40% no crescimento gengival de pacientes com aparelhos ortodônticos fixos.Métodos:indivíduos adolescentes com aparelhos ortodônticos fixos e aumento de volume gengival foram recrutados para a pesquisa (n = 30). Cada participante atuou como seu próprio controle, tendo, na maxila, um lado controle e um tratamento. No lado controle, aplicou-se verniz placebo e no lado experimental, o verniz EC40(r) Biodentic CHX, ambos na face vestibular das coroas dos pré-molares e primeiro molar superiores. Os vernizes e lados foram escolhidos de forma aleatória e a identificação deles e a que grupo pertenciam foi mantida por um terceiro observador, não sendo revelada aos pesquisadores nem aos participantes até o final do estudo. Fotografias digitais foram tiradas por um fotógrafo treinado, antes da aplicação do verniz no tempo inicial (T0), bem como 14 dias (T14) e 56 dias (T56) após a aplicação. O volume gengival foi calculado indiretamente, por meio das áreas vestibulares (mm2) das coroas dos segundos pré-molares superiores, com o softwareRapidSketch(r), em todos os tempos de estudo. Os dados foram analisados usando ANOVA e teste de Turkey-Krammer.Resultados:na amostra final de 30 indivíduos, observou-se que, em T0, os grupos controle e tratamento foram semelhantes. Já em T14 e T56, foi observada uma progressiva redução na área da coroa clínica no grupo controle, e um aumento na área média do grupo experimental (p< 0,05).Conclusão:o uso do verniz de CHX a 40% diminui o excessivo crescimento gengival em pacientes sob tratamento ortodôntico. Estudos futuros são necessários para se determinar o tempo de ação e a frequência de aplicação.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Child , Adolescent , Chlorhexidine/administration & dosage , Chlorhexidine/therapeutic use , Gingival Overgrowth/drug therapy , Bicuspid/drug effects , Orthodontic Brackets/adverse effects , Gingivitis/etiology , Gingivitis/drug therapy , Anti-Infective Agents, Local/administration & dosage , Anti-Infective Agents, Local/therapeutic use , Molar/drug effects
10.
Rev. Clín. Ortod. Dent. Press ; 13(3): 91-99, jun.-jul. 2014. ilus
Article in Portuguese | LILACS, BBO | ID: biblio-855996

ABSTRACT

A etapa de remoção de aparelhos ortodônticos deve ser realizada tentando preservar, ao máximo, a estrutura dentária. Apesar de existirem vários protocolos e materiais disponíveis no mercado, alguns profissionais desconhecem os efeitos destes materiais na superfície do esmalte, o que pode contribuir para que o esmalte seja permanentemente danificado, ou desconhecem que, quando a resina não for adequadamente removida, pode ocorrer um aumento na agregação de biofilme, tornando o esmalte mais suscetível a doenças cárie e periodontal. / Objetivo / O objetivo desse trabalho foi demonstrar, por meio de um caso clínico, uma sequência de acabamento e polimento pós-terapia ortodôntica. / Métodos / Após a remoção dos braquetes, a resina residual foi evidenciada com pó dourado (Texturmarker, Benzer Dental AG, Suíça). Em seguida, foi utilizada broca multilaminada (Komet), discos Sof-Lex (3M ESPE), borrachas para acabamento Astropol e Astrobrush (Ivoclar Vivadent), escova de pelo de cabra e FlexiBuff com pasta Enamelize (Cosmedent). / Conclusão / Pôde-se concluir que a sequência de materiais utilizados foi efetiva e de fácil execução, preservando a estrutura dentária.


Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Young Adult , Orthodontic Brackets/adverse effects , Dental Debonding/adverse effects , Dental Polishing/methods , Dental Enamel
11.
Dental press j. orthod. (Impr.) ; 19(3): 59-66, May-Jun/2014. tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-723148

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the association among gingival enlargement (GE), periodontal conditions and socio-demographic characteristics in subjects undergoing fixed orthodontic treatment. METHODS: A sample of 330 patients undergoing fixed orthodontic treatment for at least 6 months were examined by a single calibrated examiner for plaque and gingival indexes, probing pocket depth, clinical attachment loss and gingival enlargement. Socio-economic background, orthodontic treatment duration and use of dental floss were assessed by oral interviews. Associations were assessed by means of unadjusted and adjusted Poisson's regression models. RESULTS: The presence of gingival bleeding (RR 1.01; 95% CI 1.00-1.01) and excess resin around brackets (RR 1.02; 95% CI 1.02-1.03) were associated with an increase in GE. No associations were found between socio-demographic characteristics and GE. CONCLUSION: Proximal anterior gingival bleeding and excess resin around brackets are associated with higher levels of anterior gingival enlargement in subjects under orthodontic treatment. .


OBJETIVO: o objetivo desse estudo foi verificar a associação entre volume gengival (AG) com condições periodontais e características sócio-demográficas em sujeitos com aparelho ortodônticos fixo. MÉTODOS: uma amostra, de 330 participantes com aparelho ortodôntico fixo, por pelo menos seis meses, foi examinada, por um único examinador calibrado, para os índices de placa e gengivais, profundidade de sondagem, nível de inserção clínico e aumento de volume gengival. O status socioeconômico, tempo com aparelho ortodôntico fixo e uso de fio dental foram verificados por entrevista oral. A verificação das associações foi realizada por meio de modelos de regressão de Poisson sem ajuste e ajustados. RESULTADOS: a presença de sangramento gengival (RR 1.01; 95% IC 1.00-1.01) e o excesso de resina em torno dos braquetes (RR 1.02; 95% IC 1.02-1.03) foram associadas a um aumento do AG. Não foram encontradas associações entre características sócio-demográficas e AG. CONCLUSÃO: sangramento gengival proximal na região anterior e excesso de resina no entorno dos braquetes estão associados a níveis mais altos de aumento de volume gengival na região anterior em sujeitos com aparelho ortodôntico fixo. .


Subject(s)
Adolescent , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Young Adult , Gingival Overgrowth/etiology , Gingivitis/etiology , Orthodontic Brackets , Cross-Sectional Studies , Dental Plaque Index , Dental Devices, Home Care/statistics & numerical data , Educational Status , Gingival Hemorrhage/etiology , Income/statistics & numerical data , Oral Hygiene/statistics & numerical data , Orthodontic Brackets/adverse effects , Periodontal Index , Periodontal Attachment Loss/etiology , Periodontal Pocket/etiology , Resin Cements/adverse effects , Social Class , Surface Properties , Time Factors
12.
Braz. dent. j ; 23(5): 581-585, Sept.-Oct. 2012. ilus, tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-660364

ABSTRACT

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of fluoride in prevention of tooth erosion around orthodontic brackets under erosive challenge. Edgewise brackets were bonded with TransbondTM XT composite on vestibular surface of 40 bovine incisors. The teeth were assigned to 4 groups (n=10): G1: Remineralizing saliva; G2: Erosive challenge; G3: Experimental group submitted to topical application of neutral fluoride gel (2% NaF) before erosive challenge; G4: Experimental group submitted to three daily applications of fluoride dentifrice (PFM 1500 ppmF) during erosive challenge. After 14 days of erosive challenge, direct visual and tactile examination were performed by two calibrated and trained examiners (Kappa = 0.867). The following scores were used: 0 = Intact enamel, 1 = Demineralized enamel without cavity, 2 = Demineralized enamel with cavity, 3 = Remineralized enamel without cavity, 4 = Remineralized enamel with cavity. Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests were applied to determine erosion levels, establishing a confidence interval of 95% (p<0.05). G2 and G3 presented 100% of score 2, with large cavities, presenting rough and opaque surface. G4 showed 50% of score 3 and 50% of score 4. Considering the studied conditions, it was found a significant difference between G2 and G4 and between G3 and G4 (p<0.01). By contrast to single application of neutral fluoride gel, the high frequency of use of fluoride at low concentration had a great influence during the dynamics of erosion.


O objetivo do presente estudo foi avaliar o efeito do flúor na prevenção da erosão do esmalte circunjacente a braquetes ortodônticos sob desafio erosivo. Braquetes edgewise foram colados com resina TransbondTM XT na superfície vestibular de 40 incisivos bovinos. Os dentes foram divididos em 4 grupos (n = 10): G1: Saliva remineralizadora; G2: Desafio erosivo; G3: Grupo experimental submetido à aplicação tópica de flúor gel neutro (NaF a 2%) antes do desafio erosivo; G4: Grupo experimental submetido à três aplicações diárias de dentifrício fluoretado (1500 ppmF PFM) durante o desafio erosivo. Após 14 dias de desafio erosivo, foi realizado exame visual e táctil por dois examinadores calibrados e treinados (Kappa = 0,867). Os escores utilizados foram: 0 = Esmalte hígido, 1 = Esmalte desmineralizado sem cavidade, 2 = Esmalte desmineralizado com cavidade, 3 = Esmalte remineralizado sem cavidade, 4 = Esmalte remineralizado com cavidade. Foram utilizados os testes de Kruskal-Wallis e Mann-Whitney para determinar os níveis de erosão, estabelecendo um intervalo de confiança de 95% (p<0,05). O G2 e G3 apresentaram 100% de grau 2, com grandes cavidades, apresentando superfície rugosa e opaca. O G4 apresentou 50% de escore 3 e 50% de escore 4. Considerando as condições estudadas, verificou-se uma diferença significativa entre G2 e G4 e entre G3 e G4 (p<0,01). Diferentemente da aplicação única de gel fluoretado neutro, a elevada frequência de utilização de dentifrício com flúor em baixa concentração apresentou grande influência durante a dinâmica de erosão.


Subject(s)
Animals , Cattle , Dental Enamel/drug effects , Fluorides, Topical/pharmacology , Orthodontic Brackets/adverse effects , Tooth Demineralization/drug therapy , Tooth Erosion/etiology , Tooth Remineralization/methods , Fluorides, Topical/therapeutic use , Saliva, Artificial , Tooth Erosion/prevention & control
13.
Bol. Asoc. Argent. Odontol. Niños ; 40(2): 3-10, ago.-dic. 2011. ilus
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: lil-668276

ABSTRACT

El propósito de este trabajo fue la revisión de la evidencia para el tratamiento de las lesiones de mancha blanca (LMB) adyacentes a la aparatología de ortodoncia fija. En la búsqueda de trabajos clínicos relevantes publicados en inglés entre 2004 y marzo de 2011, 23 trabajos cumplieron con el criterio de inclusión. Los trabajos se evaluaron por acción preventiva y/o disminución del riesgo absoluto cuando fue posible. Los resultados muestran el uso de fluoruros tópicos agregado al de pastas dentales como la mejor estrategia basada en la evidencia para prevenir las LMB. La aplicación profesional de barnices de fluoruro alrededor de los brackets durante el tratamiento ortodóntico aportó la mayor fuerza de la evidencia en los estudios de prevención de la LMB. La aplicación en el hogar de crema remineralizante de caseína fosfopéptica -fosfato amorfo de calcio estable como adjunto al dentífrico conteniendo fluoruros, para el tratamiento post-ortodóntico de las LMB, resultó favorable pero los resultados de los estudios no son del todo concluyentes. Las nuevas tecnologías como los azúcares de alcoholes y los probióticos, aún se encuentran en estudio. Es necesario desarrollar trabajos estandarizados con buen diseño y conclusiones para recomendar juicios basados en la evidencia.


Subject(s)
Humans , Adult , Child , Orthodontic Appliances/adverse effects , Tooth Demineralization/prevention & control , Tooth Demineralization/therapy , Evidence-Based Medicine , Fluorides, Topical/therapeutic use , Orthodontic Brackets/adverse effects , Toothpastes/therapeutic use , Data Interpretation, Statistical
14.
Rev. Clín. Ortod. Dent. Press ; 10(5): 92-98, out.-nov. 2011. tab
Article in Portuguese | LILACS, BBO | ID: lil-642761

ABSTRACT

Objetivo: este estudo clínico prospectivo objetivou comparar as alterações nas dimensões das arcadas dentárias inferiores decorrentes do tratamento ortodôntico, em pacientes com má oclusão de Classes I e II de Angle tratados com braquetes autoligáveis e convencionais. Métodos: a amostra foi composta por 20 pacientes com idades entre 11 e 30 anos — 11 do Grupo 1, que utilizaram braquetes autoligáveis; e 9 do Grupo 2, tratados com braquetes convencionais. Todos apresentavam apinhamento dentário de mínimo a moderado e foram tratados durante seis meses, sem a realização de expansão, desgastes ou extrações dentárias. As distâncias intercaninos, interprimeiros e intersegundos pré-molares, interprimeiros molares e comprimento da arcada foram medidas em modelos de gesso, antes (T1) e após seis meses de tratamento (T2), com o auxílio de um paquímetro digital. Para avaliar as alterações, de T1 para T2, das dimensões nos dois grupos e para a comparação dessas alterações entre os grupos, foi empregado o teste t de Student. Resultados: em ambos os grupos houve aumento estatisticamente significativo das distâncias avaliadas, com exceção da distância interprimeiros molares e comprimento da arcada; porém, essas alterações foram similares entre os grupos. Conclusão: as alterações nas dimensões das arcadas dentárias inferiores em pacientes durante a fase inicial do tratamento ortodôntico foram similares independentemente do tipo de braquete empregado, autoligáveis ou convencionais.


Subject(s)
Humans , Child , Adolescent , Young Adult , Dental Arch/anatomy & histology , Orthodontic Brackets/adverse effects , Malocclusion, Angle Class I , Malocclusion, Angle Class II
15.
Ortodontia ; 44(5): 468-474, set.-out. 2011. ilus
Article in Portuguese | LILACS, BBO | ID: lil-713831

ABSTRACT

A busca crescente por parte dos pacientes por um tratamento ortodôntico estéticofaz com que a técnica ortodôntica lingual continue sua evolução e seu desenvolvimento.Sabendo-se que existem algumas diferenças entre a Ortodontia Lingual e a Convencional é desuma importância ressaltá-Ias, com o fim de auxiliar o profissional que já a utiliza e, também,para o conhecimento de novos ortodontistas que desejam iniciar-se na técnica lingual. Umadestas diferenças está relacionada ao desenho e ao formato do bráquete lingual. Este artigopropôs-se a discutir apenas quais são os tipos de fixação do arco lingual no slot do bráquetee como é a forma de inserção e remoção deste fio em alguns dos bráquetes linguais.


The growing search by patients for an esthetic orthodontics makes lingualorthodontics technique continues its evolution and development. Knowing that there are somedifferences between the Buccal and Lingual orthodontics It is very important to emphasizethem, to assist the professional who already uses the technique, and those who also wantto start in the technicallingual. One difference is related to the design and format of thelingual bracket. In this paper we proposed to discuss only the kinds of affachment of thelingual arch wire slot in the lingual bracket and how is the form of insertion and removal ofthis wire in some of lingual brackets.


Subject(s)
Orthodontic Brackets/adverse effects , Orthodontic Brackets , Orthodontic Wires , Malocclusion/therapy , Orthodontics, Corrective
16.
Braz. oral res ; 25(1): 85-90, Jan.-Feb. 2011. tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-595845

ABSTRACT

Nickel-free braces have gained popularity as a viable alternative for patients who are allergic to nickel. The purpose of this systematic review was to determine whether evidence exists to justify the use of nickel-free brackets in orthodontic patients who are allergic to nickel. An electronic search was performed using 7 databases (MEDLINE, BBO, LILACS, Web of Science, EMBASE, BIREME and Cochrane Library), without restriction regarding year or language, with supplemental manual searching of the references of retrieved articles. The search strategy produced 89 papers. The data extraction and quality score of each paper were evaluated independently by two reviewers, once each. After selection based on the eligibility criteria, four papers, including 2 controlled clinical trials and 2 clinical trials, qualified for the final analysis. Quality assessment of the included articles was also performed. Nickel-free braces (Ni content - 2 percent max.) seem to represent a viable alternative for orthodontic patients who are allergic to nickel. However, further in vivo studies, considering the immunology characteristics of patients, are needed to determine the clinical implications of the findings of this study.


Subject(s)
Humans , Hypersensitivity/prevention & control , Nickel/adverse effects , Orthodontic Brackets/adverse effects , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
17.
Article in English | IMSEAR | ID: sea-139950

ABSTRACT

Background and Objectives: One of the most difficult problems encountered in orthodontic treatment with fixed appliance is the control of enamel demineralization around the brackets. Fluoride-releasing bonding adhesives were introduced to aid in the prevention of demineralization adjacent to orthodontic brackets. Hence, an in vitro study was conducted to evaluate and compare demineralization adjacent to the orthodontic bracket and the bond strength using fluoride-releasing adhesive and conventional adhesive. Materials and Methods: One hundred and twenty healthy extracted premolars were selected for the study and were divided into two groups, each group consisting of 60 teeth. Both groups were further divided into three subgroups consisting of 20 samples each. Samples of subgroups A and B were bonded with two prototypes of fluoride-releasing adhesives (i.e. Rely-a-bond and Tru-bond). Samples of subgroup C (ortho-one) were bonded with conventional non-fluoride-releasing adhesive. Group I samples were subjected to demineralization in an acidic medium (methyl cellulose buffered with acetic acid at a pH of 4.5) for 4 weeks, which were later observed under a stereomicroscope. Group II samples were tested for shear bond strength using the Instron Universal testing machine. Results: Both fluoride-releasing adhesives showed statistically significant lower enamel demineralization around the bracket when compared with the conventional adhesive. There was no statistically significant difference on comparing the demineralization between the two prototypes of fluoride-releasing adhesive. Evaluation of shear bond strength revealed that there was no significant difference between the subgroups. Conclusion: Fluoride-releasing adhesives might aid in the prevention of demineralization adjacent to the orthodontic bracket with acceptable bond strength.


Subject(s)
Bisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate/chemistry , Bisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate/therapeutic use , Cariostatic Agents/administration & dosage , Cariostatic Agents/chemistry , Delayed-Action Preparations , Dental Bonding , Dental Enamel/pathology , Fluorides, Topical/administration & dosage , Fluorides, Topical/chemistry , Humans , Orthodontic Brackets/adverse effects , Polyethylene Glycols/chemistry , Polyethylene Glycols/therapeutic use , Resin Cements/chemistry , Resin Cements/therapeutic use , Shear Strength , Tooth Demineralization/etiology , Tooth Demineralization/pathology , Tooth Demineralization/prevention & control
18.
Braz. j. oral sci ; 9(2): 81-84, Apr.-June 2010. ilus, tab
Article in English | LILACS, BBO | ID: lil-578069

ABSTRACT

Aim: This study evaluated the surface roughness (Ra) and the topography (scanning electron microscopy) of the dental enamel after use of different methods for removal of residual resin after debonding of orthodontic brackets. Methods: Nine roughness measurements in three directions were made on enamel surface of 60 human premolars before bracket bonding (Ra initial).Ceramic brackets were bonded with Transbond XT and stored for 24 h/37°C before debonding with pliers. The specimens were divided in five groups according to the method used for removal of residual resin: control (C); carbide bur at slow-speed (CL); carbide bur at high speed (CH); Shofu tip at low speed (SB); Shofu tip at high speed (HB); debonding pliers (ZP). Nine final surface roughness measurements (Ra final) were made and one specimen of each group was observed by SEM. The data were analyzed statistically by ANOVA, Tukey’s test and paired t test(p<.05). Results: Ra final of SB was significantly higher than C, CL, CH, and ZP groups. The test showed that the Ra final was significantly higher than Ra initial for SB and CL. Conclusions:The method used for removal of residual resin influenced the roughness of the enamel. Carbide bur at high speed presented the best results and Shofu at low speed presented the worst results.


Subject(s)
Humans , Orthodontic Brackets/adverse effects , Dental Debonding/methods , Dental Enamel/chemistry , In Vitro Techniques , Dental Polishing/methods , Dental Prophylaxis/methods , Acrylic Resins/chemistry , Analysis of Variance , Bicuspid , Microscopy, Electron, Scanning , Surface Properties
19.
Braz. oral res ; 21(4): 298-302, 2007. ilus, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-467972

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to evaluate the allergenic potential of orthodontic brackets, comparing the cutaneous sensitivity provoked by metals present in conventional metallic brackets to that provoked by brackets with a low concentration of nickel, known as "nickel-free". A sample was selected from 400 patients undergoing treatment in the orthodontic clinic of the Pontifical Catholic University of Minas Gerais (Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil), in the period from the beginning of 2002 to the end of 2003. A cutaneous sensitivity patch test containing 5 percent nickel sulphate was used in 58 patients (30 males and 28 females), aged between 11 and 30, which were using fixed appliances with Morelli® brackets in both arches. In a second phase, 30 days later, a comparative test of cutaneous sensitivity was applied to the whole sample with two types of test specimens, in the form of a disc. Two alloys were tested: discs composed of the alloy used in the construction of conventional brackets and discs composed of a nickel-free alloy. The internal part of the forearm was chosen for testing, and 20 test specimens of each experiment (corresponding to the twenty brackets of a complete fixed appliance) were applied. Of the 58 patients evaluated, 16 patients were sensitive to the patch test with 5 percent nickel sulphate. Out of these 16 patients, 12 developed an allergic reaction to experiment 1 (test specimen with nickel), while in experiment 2, only 5 patients showed sensitivity to that sample. The McNemar test revealed that the nickel-free test specimens provoked less allergic reaction when compared with the conventional alloy (p = 0.016).


Este trabalho teve como objetivo avaliar a capacidade alergênica provocada pelos bráquetes ortodônticos, comparando a sensibilidade cutânea provocada pelos metais presentes nos bráquetes metálicos convencionais com a provocada por bráquetes com baixa concentração de níquel ("nickel-free"). A amostra foi selecionada dos 400 pacientes em tratamento da clínica de Ortodontia da Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais (Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil), no período compreendido entre o início de 2002 e o final de 2003. A amostra consistiu de 58 pacientes (30 homens e 28 mulheres), com idades variando de 11 a 30 anos, os quais eram portadores de aparelho ortodôntico fixo Morelli® em ambos os arcos. Estes pacientes foram diagnosticados quanto à sensibilidade ao níquel, por meio da aplicação do "patch test" com sulfato de níquel a 5 por cento. Em uma segunda fase, trinta dias após o "patch test", comparou-se a sensibilidade cutânea provocada pelos metais presentes nos bráquetes convencionais e nos "Nickel Free", por meio de um teste de sensibilidade cutânea utilizando-se dois tipos de corpos-de-provas, em formato de disco, com a mesma composição destes bráquetes. A área de eleição para realização deste teste foi a parte interna do antebraço, sendo aplicados vinte corpos-de-prova de cada experimento (referente a uma boca completa de bráquetes). Dos 58 pacientes avaliados, 16 deles foram sensíveis ao "patch test" com sulfato de níquel a 5 por cento. Dentre estes 16 pacientes, 12 deles desenvolveram reação alérgica ao Experimento 1 (corpo-de-prova com níquel), enquanto que no Experimento 2 (corpo-de-prova "Niquel Free") apenas 5 pacientes apresentaram sensibilidade a esta amostra. O teste de McNemar revelou que os corpos-de-prova "nickel-free" provocaram menor reação alérgica quando comparados aos convencionais (p = 0.016).


Subject(s)
Adolescent , Adult , Child , Female , Humans , Male , Dental Alloys/adverse effects , Dermatitis, Contact/etiology , Nickel/adverse effects , Orthodontic Brackets/adverse effects , Stainless Steel/adverse effects , Dental Alloys/chemistry , Materials Testing , Patch Tests
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL